Home About Contact Staff Syndicate Site Map
Advanced Search

« New facilities for GPO | Main | Ask and ye shall find »

Protect public information

contributed by Thomas L. at 03:48 PM on February 10, 2004.

Keeping up with intellectual property law pointed me to this:

The Database and Collections of Information Misappropriation Act. This is a seemingly harmless bit of legislation aimed at protecting people's hard work - but it could be used to eventually close to the public a large amount of information that is now freely accessible online. I won't go into a total information is the right of man to his own self tirade... but I will point to the direction of Public Knowledge.org's Public Action to send a fax to your Representative and Committee Leadership, telling them why they should oppose H.R. 3261.

Link awareness through Copyfight.org
Other must reads through Electronic Frontier Federation

Comments (3) | Categorized in: Library: Government , Topic: Gov Docs , Topic: Intellectual Property

Comments

I reported on similar legislation that has been enacted in the E.U. in a class almost a year ago. I knew it'd only be a matter of time before legislation would be proposed here as well. Personally, I think the work of database creators should be considered intellectual property, as much as the data in it is, but I'm going to reserve any further comment until I can read the actual bill.

Posted by: michael | February 10, 2004 04:04 PM

By the way, here is the full text of the bill:

H.R.3261 - Database and Collections of Information Misappropriation Act

Posted by: michael | February 10, 2004 04:16 PM

Michael, that link to the full text is not connecting.
I suppose I am closer to the side of the argument which might be considered 'radical.' You probably know that type of person, we like to steal music and share software. I don't think copyrights serve the interests of anyone except those people who want to make a profit.
However, I obviously understand the benefits of ownership, as owners can invest profit back into projects. There are many questions about this, and no sure direction. Uncertainty remains; and I would like to know more about this bill. I will hold off any more discussion until further review.

Posted by: t_l | February 13, 2004 11:26 AM

Due to the proliferation of comment spam, I've had to close comments on this entry. If you would like to leave comment, please use one of my recent entries. Thank you and sorry for any inconvience caused.